Chemical composition of differently processed Cattle Hoof meal Waste as Feedstuff Ingredient

  • A. E. Falaye Department of Aquaculture and Fisheries Management, University of Ibadan, Ibadan
  • S. O. Sule Onabanjo University, Ayetoro Campus, Ogun State, Nigeria
Keywords: Slaughter-waste, Valorisation, Keratin, Cattle hoof


Waste generation at slaughter from ruminant has led to environmental concerns. Processing slaughter house waste will reduce the problem of disposal and possible utilisation in livestock feed. Subjecting Cattle hoof meal to different processing methods can help in enhancing its nutritive value. Cattle hoof were obtained from the slaughter house; raw hoof was subjected to processing methods by boiling; chemical treatment with 10 % soda ash + boiling; fermentation treatment in water + boiling; 10 % wood ash treatment in water + boiling; autoclave treatment and samples analysed for proximate composition, amino acid profile and mineral content analysis according to standard methods. The hoof proximal analysis ranged 9.30 ± 0.06 % – 12.39 ± 0.01 % moisture content; 0.34 ± 0.01 % – 2.50 ± 0.12 % ash; 0.31 ± 0.01 % – 1.47 ± 0.02 % crude fat; 0.19 ± 0.02 % – 12.71 ± 0.15 % crude fibre and 85.27 ± 0.20 % – 90.74 ± 0.26 % crude protein in all samples. The amino acids profile of the hoof showed significant difference among treated samples. Tryptophan an essential amino acid was below detectable limit in all processed samples and raw hoof. The essential and non-essential minerals content showed significant difference (P < 0.05) among treatments with highest (Mg, Fe, K) in wood ash; (Cu) in raw hoof; (Ca, Na, P, Mn, Zn) in autoclaved samples. This study, suggest that Cattle hoof has the potential of being exploited as a source of animal protein for feed formulation in animal nutrition. This research concludes that the different processing methods affect the nutritive profiles of treated samples hence supplementation of limiting amino acids envisaged.


Adejumo, I. O., Adetunji, C. O., Ogundipe, K. & Osademe, S. O. (2016). Chemical composition and amino acid profile of differently processed Feather meal. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 61(3), 237–246. article/453.

AFRIS (2012). Animal Feed Resources Information System, Cattle Hoof and Horn Meal. Date accessed 29/1/2019.

Akinfolarin, B. O. & Okubanjo A. O. (2010). Human Population Growth Rate and Meat Supply in Lagos state (1991–2000). Acta. SATECH, 3 (2) 19–24. index.php?q=journal.view.94.

Alao, B. O., Falowo, A. B., Chulayo, A. & Muchenje, V. (2017). The Potentials of Animal By-products in Food Systems: Production, Prospects and Challenges. Sustainability, 9(7), 1089. doi: 10.3390/su9071089.

AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis. (Association of Official Analytical Chemicals 17th ed. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, AOAC International. Arlington, Virginia, USA, by AOAC International.

Asaba, S. (2015). Why you should not throw away Cow hooves. The New Times Rwanda. August 17. date accessed 8/11/2018.

Assis, B. M., Vulcani, V. A. S., Silva, L. A. F., Dias, M., Pancotti, A., Lima, C. R. O., & Rabelo, R. E. (2017). Biochemical composition of the hoof capsule of buffaloes and its influence on hoof quality. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 69(1), 57–64. doi: 10.1590/1678-4162-9259.

Belewu, M. A., Asafa, A. R., & Ogunleke, F. O. (2008). Processing of feather meal by solid state fermentation. Biotechnology, 7(3), 589–591. doi: 10.3923/biotech.2008.589.591.

Benitez, L. V. (1989). Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Profiles in Aquaculture Nutrition Studies, In S.S. De Silva (ed.) Fish Nutrition Research in Asia. Proceedings of the Third Asian Fish Nutrition Network Meeting. Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, Philippines. Special Publication, 4, 23–35.

Chojnacka, K., Górecka, H., Michalak, I., & Górecki, H. (2011). A review: valorization of keratinous materials. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2(3), 317–321. doi: 10.1007/s12649-011-9074-6.

Coward-Kelly, G., Chang, V. S., Agbogbo, F. K., & Holtzapple, M. T. (2006). Lime treatment of keratinous materials for the generation of highly digestible animal feed: 1. Chicken feathers. Bioresource Technology, 97(11), 1337–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.021.

Devendra, C. (1985). Non-conventional Feed Resources in Asia and the Pacific. FAO/Regional Animal Production and Health Commission for Asia, the Far-East and South-West Pacific (APHCA) Bangkok. Publication 6. Pp. 105

Falaye, A. E. (1982). The use of Hydrolysed Feather meal alone or in combination with supplemental amino acids, as dietary protein source for Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. M.Sc. Dissertation, Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland.

Falaye, A. E. (1992). Utilization of Agro-industrial Wastes as Fish Feedstuffs in Nigeria. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the FISON, Abeokuta, 16–20, November, 1992. pg. 47–46.

FAOSTAT (2017). Producing Animals/Slaughtered (Head) Nigeria. FAO Statistics Division.

Gohl, B. (1981). Tropical feeds: feed information summaries and nutritive values. FAO, Rome.

Kakkah, P., Madhan, B., & Shanmugam, G. (2014). Extraction and Characteriszation of Keratin from bovine hoof: A potential material for biomedical applications. Springerplus, 3, 596. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-596.

Kida, K., Morimura, S., Noda, J., Nishida, Y., Imai, T., & Otagirf, M. (1995). Enzymatic Hydrolysis of the Horn and Hoof of Cow and Buffalo. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 80(5), 478–484. doi: 10.1016/0922-338X(96)80923-8.

Kinyanjui, W., & Noor, M. S. (2013). From Waste to Employment Opportunities and Wealth Creation: A Case Study of Utilization of Livestock By-Products in Hargeisa, Somaliland. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 4(12), 1287–1292. doi: 10.4236/fns.2013.412165.

Omitoyin, B. O. (1995). Utilization of Poultry By-products (Feather and Offal) in the Diets of African Catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell) Ph.d thesis, University of Ibadan Nigeria.

Owen, O., Winsor, G. W. & Long, M. I. E. (1953a). Laboratory tests on some hoof and horn materials used in Horticulture 1.-Raw samples without preliminary treatment. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 4(9), 415–422. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740040904.

Owen, O., Winsor, G. W., & Long, M. I. E. (1953b). Laboratory test on some hoof and horn materials used in Horticulture. II- Materials heat- treated during processing. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 4(9), 423–430. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740040905.

Pauzenga, U. (1985). Feeding Parent Stock. J. Zoo. Tech. Int., 22–24.

Robel, E. J. (1967). Ion-Exchange Chromatograph for the Determination of Tryptophan. Analytical Biochemistry, 18(3), 406–413. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(67)90098-X.

Sotolu, A. O. (2008). Growth performance and Nutrient utilization of Clarias gariepinus fed Leucaena leucocephala seed meal based diet. Phd thesis, University of Ibadan.

Sule, S. O., & Odugbose, D. B. (2014). Assessment of Dry and Wet Milling using Fabricated Burr Mill. Food Science and Quality Management, 31, 1–11. index.php/FSQM/article/view/15567.

Tomlinson, D. J., Mülling, C. H., & Fakler, T. M. (2004). Invited review: formation of keratins in the bovine claw: roles of hormones, minerals, and vitamins in functional claw integrity. Journal of Dairy Science, 87(4), 797–809. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73223-3.

Walsh, C. (2014). The use of animal By-products: the improving opportunities to add Value to the beef and sheep slaughtering sectors. English Beef and Lamb Executives (EBLEX) pg. 46.

Wang, X., & Parsons, C. M. (1997). Effect of Processing Systems on Protein Quality of Feather Meals and Hog Hair Meals. Poultry Science, 76(3), 491–496. doi: 10.1093/ps/76.3.491.

Zazzo, A., Harrison, S. M., Bahar, B., Moloney, A. P., Monahan, F. J., Scrimgeour, C. M., & Schmidt, O. (2007). Experimental Determination of Dietary Carbon Turnover in Bovine Hair and Hoof. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 85(12), 1239–1248. doi: 10.1139/Z07-110.
How to Cite
Falaye, A., & Sule, S. (2020). Chemical composition of differently processed Cattle Hoof meal Waste as Feedstuff Ingredient. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, 3(1), 47-51.