Effectiveness of phytobiotic for prophylactic non-contagious gastrointestinal diseases in suckling piglets
The article presents the results of prophylactic effectiveness phytobiotic feed additive XTRACT™ 6930 for non-contagious diseases of the gastrointestinal tract in the composition of the basic diet of suckling pigs on modern pig farm. Diseases of the gastrointestinal tract make up from 40 to 60% of internal pathology in pigs. Used phytobiotic XTRACT™ 6930 with preventive measures, which had positive influence on oxygen-transport function of blood, hemoglobin synthesis and erythrocytopoesis in animals, as indicated by the number of erythrocytes, MCH and hematocrit in blood of suckling piglets from experimental group. Feeding of XTRACT™ 6930 had also positive influence on leukopoesis, as indicated by increased leukocyte rate in blood of suckling piglets from experimental group within physiological fluctuations. Increase of leukocyte rate can be caused by stimulation of non-specific resistance in piglets, which plays main role in defence of animals during early ontogenesis. As it is known, stabilization of phagocytic activity of leukocytes occurs during first months of age, when the body of pigs is able to synthesize most humoral factors of protection. Application of suckling piglets feed additive XTRACT™ 6930 for 18 days resulted in a positive impact on metabolism: increased levels of total protein, albumin, glucose serum; reduced levels of urea, phosphorus; reduced the activity of ALT, AST, ALP and GGT within physiological fluctuations. The use of phytobiotic feed additive XTRACT™ 6930 in experimental group of piglets increased the survival of piglets from experimental group in sucking period compared with control group of animals by reducing the percentage of morbidity and mortality from non-contagious diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Consequently, it was established that the use XTRACT™ 6930 has positive effect on biochemical blood parameters of piglets, decreases their morbidity and mortality before weaning.
Solà-Oriol, D., & Gasa, J. (2017). Feeding strategies in pig produc-tion: Sows and their piglets. Animal Feed Science and Tech-nology, 233, 34–52. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.07.018.
Pluske, J.R., Turpin, D.L., & Kim, J.C. (2018). Gastrointestinal tract (gut) health in the young pig. Animal Nutrition, 4(2), 187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.12.004.
Holman, D.B., & Chénierab, M.R. (2015). Antimicrobial use in swine production and its effect on the swine gut microbiota and antimicrobial resistance. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 61(11), 785–798. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2015-0239.
Chowdhury, R., Haque, M.N., Islam, K.M.S., & Khaleduzzaman, A.B.M. (2009). A review on antibiotics in an animal feed. Bang. J. Anim. Sci., 38(1&2), 22–32. doi: 10.3329/bjas.v38i1-2.9909.
Cromwell, G.L. (2002). Why and how antibiotics are used in swine production. Animal Biotechnology, 13(1), 7–27. doi: 10.1081/ABIO-120005767.
Kiczorowska, B., Samolinska, W., & Al-Yasiry, A.R.M. (2017). The natural feed additives as immunostimulants in monogastric animal nutrition – a review. Ann. Anim. Sci., 17(3), 605–625. doi: 10.1515/aoas-2016-0076.
Jacela, J.Y., DeRouchey, J.M., Tokach, M.D., Goodband, R.D., Nelssen, J.L. Renter, D.G., & Dritz, S.S. (2010). Feed additives for swine: Fact sheets – prebiotics and probiotics, and phytogenics. J. Swine Health Prod., 18(3), 132–136. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/15567
Kommera, S.K., Mateo, R.D., Neher, F.J., & Kim, S.W. (2006). Phytobiotics and Organic Acids As Potential Alternatives to the Use of Antibiotics in Nursery Pig Diets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 19(12), 1784–1789. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2006.1784.
Costa, L.B., Luciano, F.B., Miyada, V.S., & Gois, F.D. (2013). Herbal extracts and organic acids as natural feed additives in pig diets. South African Journal of Animal Science, 43(2), 181–193.
Vidanarachchi, J.K., Mikkelsen, L.L., Sims, I., Iji, P.A., & Choct, M. (2005). Phytobiotics: alternatives to antibiotic growth pro-moters in monogastric animal feeds. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia, 15, 131–144. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6ce9/56bce006864cf81d3335415b44ef20c6430a.pdf.
Vlizlo, V.V., Fedorchuk R.S., Ratych I.B. et al. (2012). Laboratorni metody doslidzhen' u biologii', tvarynnyctvi ta veterynarnij medycyni: dovidnyk. L'viv, SPOLOM (in Ukrainian).
Official Journal of the European Union L276/33. Directive 2010/63/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. 86/609/EC. 20. 10. 2010.
Czech, A., Smolczyk, A., & Ognik, K. (2018). Effect of dietary supplementation with Yarrowia lipolytica or Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast and probiotic additives on haematological pa-rameters and the gut microbiota in piglets. Research in Veteri-nary Science, 119, 221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.06.007.
Trckova, M., Prikrylova Vondruskova, H., Zraly, Z. [et al.] (2014). The effect of dietary bentonite on post-weaning diarrhoea, growth performance and blood parameters of weaned piglets. Applied Clay Science, 90, 35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2013.11.009.
Todoriuk, V.B., Gutyj, B.V., Khomyk, R.I., & Vasiv, R.O. (2016). Influence of ferrovet 7.5% and ferosel T on the concentration of mineral substances in the blood serum of piglets suffering from Iron deficit anemia. Scientific Messenger LNUVMBT named after S.Z. Gzhytskyj, 18, 3(71), 139–143. doi: 10.15421/nvlvet7131.
Zhu, L., Wang, G., Dong, B., Peng, C.C., & Gong, L.M. (2016) Effects of sweetener neotame on diet preference, performance and hematological and biochemical parameters of weaned pig-lets. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 214, 86–94. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.02.013.
Yang, H.S., Xiong, X., Li, J.Z., & Yin, Y.L. (2016). Effects of chito-oligosaccharide on intestinal mucosal amino acid profiles and alkaline phosphatase activities, and serum biochemical var-iables in weaned piglets. Livestock Science, 190, 141–146. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.06.008.
Ma, S., Ma, M., Mu, C., Yu, K., & Zhu, W. (2015). Comparisons of blood biochemical parameters, digestive enzyme activities and volatile fatty acid profile between Meishan and Yorkshire piglets. Animal Nutrition, 1(4), 289–292. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2015.12.002.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.